• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Litigation

Home Litigation (Page 13)
NYC Issues Violations to Condos and Coops because of Illegal Short Term Rentals

NYC Issues Violations to Condos and Coops because of Illegal Short Term Rentals

Here are 3 violations issued by NYC to the Farragut Gardens Condominium at 538 East 86th Street in Brooklyn, because of short term rental violations.  In that condo, just 1 unit was short term renting.

The NYC Office of Special Enforcement is issuing violations to condominiums and cooperatives because of short term rentals.  Indeed, NYC is warning property managers, owners and hosts that:

Violations of Short Term Rental Restrictions like the ones below will be issued to property owners including condos, coops and other community associations, and that property owners must “ensure their properties are maintained in a safe and code-compliant manner at all times.”

NYC’s position, affirmed by the Courts, is that lack of knowledge by the condo or coop is not a defense.  

If condos and coops are proactive by registering their rental restrictions publicly with Know Your Rental™, they will have some mitigation evidence in response to violations like this.  Registration should be a part of a building’s compliance effort.  Know Your Rental™ (https://knowyourrental.org/why-kyr/) is an inexpensive way towards fulfilling a condos or coops short term rental compliance responsibility; particularly when thousands of dollars in fines could be issued which are not covered by insurance.

 

Buildings’ Lack of Knowledge of Wrongful Short Term Renting — No Defense to Steep NYC Fines

Buildings’ Lack of Knowledge of Wrongful Short Term Renting — No Defense to Steep NYC Fines

New York City coops, condos and other community associations must take action to ensure they are in compliance with short term rental rules.  If not, it will be difficult to defend against the thousands of dollars in fines that NYC is imposing for violations. And, lack of knowledge of the illegal short term renting, is not a defense.

In response to illegal renting on short term rental sites like Airbnb, NY State and NYC has been enacting new regulations and starting to enforce them by issuing violations with significant fines.  Short term rental violations are seen as important public concern because buildings with short-term rentals in NYC and around the world are reporting that they suffer from life, health and safety problems because of transient tenancy.

NYC’s position is clearly that lack of knowledge that short term renting is happening in a building is no defense to a violation and fine. The Appeals Court in Manhattan just agreed upholding a $53,100 fine. NYC has been warning owners, property managers and hosts that violations will be issued to the property owner even if tenants are doing the illegal short term renting.  See NYC Office of Special Enforcement warning.  

The $53,100 fine against the 264 unit building at 360 West 43rd Street in Manhattan, should be “a shot in the arm” for NYC coop and condo boards.  Even though only 3 of the 264 units were caught illegally short term renting and the owner claimed it didn’t know, NYC was steadfast in its position that  ignorance is no defense.  

According to the City, owners have the responsibility to maintain the premises and to be up to code.  For example, any transient use in the building requires full compliance with applicable fire-alarm and sprinkler requirements, and the owners are legally responsible for its tenants’ illegal use of the premises.

According to a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, the violations issued by NYC were “supported by substantial evidence” and the building’s attempt to get out of the $53,100 fine by arguing lack of knowledge was “unavailing”.

Buildings should be taking action to bring awareness to  short term rental restrictions that apply to them.  NYC prohibits renting for less than 30 days in most cases, but a condo or coop may not allow it for less than 1 year.  It is important to make sure that people know your rental restrictions and the jurisdictional ones that apply to you.  

Know Your Rental (knowyourrental.org) is a new official building registry which buildings can use to inform people worldwide of the short term rental restrictions applicable to their building.  If you are registered and taking such proactive measures to try to comply with the law and informing the public of the short term rental restrictions, you can raise that as a part of your defense if you’re issued a NYC violation and fine. Coops, condos and community associations need to be proactive to avoid short term rental violations and the steep fines; particularly, now that lack of knowledge is not going to help them.

All Buildings need to Register on Know Your Rental (knowyourrental.org)

All Buildings need to Register on Know Your Rental (knowyourrental.org)

We have been hearing a lot lately about Airbnb and other short-term rental sites battling with local jurisdictions like NYC and Boston about the rental restrictions there.  Throughout the world we are seeing jurisdictions starting to regulate or outlaw short term renting.  What we are not seeing is community associations and buildings flexing their muscles in the equation.  

It’s at the building level that there are reports of crime, noise and other life, safety and health issues.  Neighbors are faced with short term renters infiltrating their home buildings. During the New York Marathon this year, one condo reported hundreds of short term visitors in their lobby and health club during race weekend, complaining of safety concerns – who are these people in my building?  During college football season, towns where top teams play come to life in the short term rental market where millions of dollars in rents are earned.

How do the buildings protect themselves?  Finally, a company launched Know Your Rental (knowyourrental.org) where a building can have a voice and publish their rental restrictions in an Official Registry that renters can search before accepting a rental.  If it is illegal to rent in a particular building on a short term basis, renters will not rent there. Who wants to book a family vacation in NYC only to find out after you’re in the apartment that the rental is illegal.

Buildings could remind their own owners about rental restrictions, but renters from around the world previously had no way of knowing in advance whether a rental was legal.  Indeed, on Airbnb, prospective renters don’t even know the address until booking.  At that point the renter needs to know the building’s rental restrictions so the renter can decide whether to proceed with the rental.  If the rental agency is connected with Know Your Rental, owners listing their property for rent and renters both will be automatically notified before proceeding.

At just $100/yr for visibility worldwide, Know Your Rental has tremendous value.  It notifies renters of your building’s particular restrictions (as well as your jurisdiction’s restrictions when they register).  You can tell your owners that you are taking proactive measures to protect them and your building from wrongful renting, and indeed deter illegal renting.

Associations have to Assert Affirmative Defenses or They’ll be Waived

Associations have to Assert Affirmative Defenses or They’ll be Waived

It is critical that defense counsel review all affirmative defenses with their clients to assure there aren’t any affirmative defenses available.  If you don’t raise the affirmative defense in the first responsive pleading (i.e., the answer to the complaint or motion to dismiss the complaint) then the affirmative defense will be waived as a matter of law in New York.

In Eida v. Board of Managers of 135 Condominium, the condominium board of managers did not raise affirmative defenses of statute of limitations or standing and the Appellate Division First Department held that the condo thus waived the right to defend itself with those defenses which could be case finishing.  In that case, Isaac Eida complained that the amendment of the condo’s by-laws was void because the Board did not abide by notice requirements in seeking an amendment.

The Court also held that the lower court  “erred in granting defendant attorneys’ fees since such award was not authorized by agreement between the parties or by statute (see e.g. Chapel v Mitchell , 84 NY2d 345, 349 [1994]), and defendant did not contend that plaintiff engaged in frivolous conduct.”

The lesson here is that the defendant condo and its attorney should have made sure it raised all the condo’s affirmative defenses.  If it had, the case likely would have been over.  Now the condo has to defend the case on the merits.  An approach the condo might take is just to call another meeting seeking an amendment of the by-laws and make sure it satisfies all the requirements for their to be an effective amendment.

Here is the Court’s decision.

Board Members Using Personal Email is an Awful Idea

Board Members Using Personal Email is an Awful Idea

Using Personal Email for Community Association Business is an Awful Idea Says Lawyers

New York Court holds Noisy Condo Unit Owner in Contempt

New York Court holds Noisy Condo Unit Owner in Contempt

This is not an ordinary case of noise in a condominium.  Typically, condo boards have limited recourse with respect to a noisy neighbor.  Unlike cooperative housing corporation counterparts which have a landlord-tenant relationship with owners, condominium’s do not.  Boards typically leave owner-owner disputes to owners to resolve amongst themselves, but sometimes condo boards have to intervene and the Coleman case was one of those.

Attorney Andrea J. Coleman is an owner in the One Grand Army Plaza Condominium.  She is in foreclosure but that is not the issue.  For quite some time she has been a nuisance to her neighbors, blasting classical music and shrieking things such as “Obama is a murderer!” and “Rape!” around the clock.  It was so bad that the condo had to hire an attorney to sue Ms. Coleman for breach of contract for violating the bylaws, nuisance and injunctive relief.  The condo won and when Ms. Coleman failed to stop, they won again obtaining a contempt order from the Court.  If Ms. Coleman doesn’t stop she’ll be fined, over and over again.

The trouble is that she is still in possession of the condominium and she is out of money.  The contempt order would help if she had money or was worried about having to pay the money so as to curb her conduct.   From the looks of it, the condominium must have spent a lot of legal fees for which it may never recover.  Most condominium bylaws don’t allow the recovery of legal fees in these situations.  Creative lawyering in seeking a contempt order and monetary penalties for noncompliance may help recoup the fees, but as stated, Ms. Coleman is broke and in foreclosure.  The good news is that the Courts are willing in extreme cases like this to intervene and help damaged neighbors to the extent that it was in the Court’s power to do so.

Read more.

New York Unanimously Passes New HOA Records Keeping and Production Requirements

New York Unanimously Passes New HOA Records Keeping and Production Requirements

Throughout most of our country, the states have laws requiring community associations like condominiums, HOA’s and cooperatives to keep certain official records of the entity and make them available to stakeholder owners, members or shareholders upon request.  Some laws provide a list of the types of official records and others don’t.  Some require stakeholders to jump through hoops (like stating a good faith reason for the review) before records will be provided for review and others don’t  Some states like Florida have realized that owners own their condominium associations and have a right to review certain records whenever and wherever they want and just passed a law requiring condominiums with 150 or more units to have specific web access for owners that is compliant with the Florida law.  Florida even made it a potential crime for condominiums of all sizes not to provide access to official records within a short period of time to inquiring owners. If those official records are not provided in just 10 working days of the request, there is a presumption of willfulness and a right of the owner to recover damages including legal fees incurred, along with a possible criminal charge against the offender. Indeed, Florida provides that “[a] unit owner who is denied access to official records is entitled to the actual damages or minimum damages for the association’s willful failure to comply. Minimum damages are $50 per calendar day for up to 10 days, beginning on the 11th working day after receipt of the written request. The failure to permit inspection entitles any person prevailing in an enforcement action to recover reasonable attorney’s fees from the person in control of the records who, directly or indirectly, knowingly denied access to the records.”

New York has just joined the states amending the Not-For-Profit Corporation law, Section 621, adding a list of official records that HOA’s must let their member owners review.  In addition to the existing “annual balance sheet and profit and loss statement or a financial statement performing a similar function for the preceding fiscal year, and, if any interim balance sheet or profit and loss or similar financial statement has been distributed to its members or otherwise made available to the public, the most recent such interim balance sheet or profit and loss or similar financial statement,” there is now a list of official records that must be maintained and available in a “reasonable” time for review.

New York HOA member owners are now entitled to review “invoices, ledgers, bank accounts, reconciliations, contracts, and any documents related to the expenditure of Homeowner Association dues.”  The amendment was passed unanimously by the Senate and signed by the Governor.  That means the entire State of New York is in favor of this new transparency requirement that is sweeping the nation.  When Florida passed its new condo laws, the change was unanimous in the Legislature as well. We will wait to see if New York expands requirements for other community associations like condominiums and cooperatives, defines the “reasonable” time period for responding to the request like Florida and Illinois and others, and imposes a civil or criminal sanction like Florida.  Irrespective, New York HOA’s and community associations in states like Florida, Illinois and others, must take steps now to comply with the new legal requirements.  Office of the Board is an easy and cost-effective way to start complying instantly (www.officeoftheboard.com).

Members Get Burnt by Bad Board Members Using Association $500k for Themselves

Members Get Burnt by Bad Board Members Using Association $500k for Themselves

Board Members who misspend is one thing. This Palm Beach, Florida group of Board Members used their association’s money as their own personal piggy bank and now have to face the music in criminal court. The Whitehall Condominium’s owners now have to figure out how to make up the $500,000 plus that the Board Members dissipated.

It is alleged that an estimated $357,200 was spent by the Board Members on their own personal expenses. The members sat idle while the Board Members spent association money on themselves. Records weren’t kept so its hard for the owners to piece it all together. This happens a lot in community associations. A small group of owners run the Board and everyone else sits back and hopes that Board Members are doing the right thing. This association bet on a loser of a Board and now has to pay the price.

The condominium owners should have been demanding regular financial reports and reviewing association records that they are entitled to review under the bylaws and state law. They didn’t demand that the Board have official records which satisfy legal requirements and now they will all pay the price. An Office of the Board would have kept the Board Members honest or exposed their scheme and fraud long before $500,000 was spent and now long gone.

Read More

You should not blindly trust your fellow board members

You should not blindly trust your fellow board members

This time a treasurer of a Florida homeowners’ association decided to use her association’s bank account as a personal piggy bank. From 2003 when she became treasurer till 2015 she and her son took $123,000. Once again we see these situations throughout the country where volunteer Board members do not have unfettered access to association records and are not satisfying their fiduciary obligation as Board members.

Board members should make sure they have such access and regularly review the records. Thefts like this could be prevented or at least discovered early and minimized. There is just no excuse for Board members to sit idle and not satisfy their fiduciary obligations. This time for 12 years cost this HOA $123,000.

Read the story here.

Board transparency requirements are increasing. Boards need to be legally ready.

Board transparency requirements are increasing. Boards need to be legally ready.

There is increasing pressure towards Board transparency and member entitlement to records. This is yet another example. A New York City Appeal Court’s recent decision addressed in the article requiring greater access to Board records and the right to make paper and electronic copies of records subject to a confidentiality agreement is a huge transparency shift that Boards have to be prepared to deal with.

Read this Article from Habitat Magazine.

  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close