• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Employers, Your Non-Compete Agreements Must Have Time Limits

Home BusinessEmployers, Your Non-Compete Agreements Must Have Time Limits
Employers, Your Non-Compete Agreements Must Have Time Limits

Employers, Your Non-Compete Agreements Must Have Time Limits

Posted by Joseph Colbert, Esq. Business, Litigation

In the recent case of L&M Pilates Brooklyn Mgmt, LLC v. Milla Lerner, the New York Supreme Court reaffirmed the importance of including specific time restrictions in non-compete agreements. Without them, your attempts to protect your business interests could be thwarted as the agreement will be deemed unenforceable.

Guidance from the Case

An independent pilates instructor violated her contract by opening a competing studio in the same area while still under contract. Despite a non-compete and non-solicitation clause in the contract, there was a dispute over the time limitation. The employer argued that a one-year restriction applied to both elements, but the contract’s wording explicitly limited the one-year term to the non-solicitation only.

The court’s decision highlights key points for employers:

  • Non-competes must be time-bound: Non-compete provisions without clear time limits will be considered unenforceable.
  • Ambiguity hurts enforceability: The court will not attempt to revise an agreement’s missing terms. In this case, even though the employer acknowledged the lack of a time limit earlier in a cease-and-desist letter, it couldn’t be fixed at the time of the lawsuit.
  • Protecting customer relationships: While the non-compete failed, the court upheld the validity of the non-solicitation clause. This recognizes that employers have a legitimate interest in protecting client relationships developed through employee interactions.


Key Takeaways for Employers

  1. Clearly define time limits: When drafting or reviewing non-compete agreements, explicitly state the time restriction for the non-compete clause.
  2. Seek legal guidance: Consult with an attorney to ensure your non-compete agreements are well-crafted and legally valid in your jurisdiction. AI will not save you and your business in court.
  3. Reasonableness matters: Even with time limits, restrictions must be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic area to be enforceable.
  4. Focus on non-solicitation: A well-defined non-solicitation clause can safeguard customer relationships, potentially having a better chance of enforcement than a broad non-compete.


Protecting Your Business

Non-compete agreements, when used strategically, protect crucial business interests. However, without careful attention to their terms, including time limitations, they can fail their intended purpose. Review your existing agreements and consult with an employment lawyer for the best protection tailored to your specific needs.

Read the decision here.

httpsiapps.courts.state_.ny_.usnyscefViewDocumentdocIndexjOjozod0FcpybGXFzXpShADownload
Share

About Joseph Colbert, Esq.

With offices in New York and Connecticut, we are ready to handle your legal needs. We have been representing condo, coop and HOA boards, businesses and individual clients for over twenty five years.

You also might be interested in

Sublet Fees for Sponsors or Holders of Unsold Shares

Sublet Fees for Sponsors or Holders of Unsold Shares

Oct 7, 2019

Attorney Joe Colbert discusses a recent case allowing New York[...]

New York Court holds Noisy Condo Unit Owner in Contempt

New York Court holds Noisy Condo Unit Owner in Contempt

Dec 27, 2017

This is not an ordinary case of noise in a[...]

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

Mar 5, 2021

More tenants’ rights legislation. If passed condo and coop owners[...]

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close