• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Posts by Team Colbert Law

Home Author Team Colbert Law (Page 6)

About Team Colbert Law

With offices in New York and Connecticut, we are ready to handle your legal needs. We have been representing condo, coop and HOA boards, businesses and individual clients for over twenty five years.

Board Members, and Owners, have to Watch Each Other

Board Members, and Owners, have to Watch Each Other

A condo owner who served 15 years on the board was arrested and accused of stealing millions of dollars of monthly maintenance fees and diverting them for personal use. The accused served as President for some years, and even President and Treasurer during other years. At one point, he was the only signer on the association’s bank account and the holder of the only checking card linked to another bank account for the condo. The second association account actually had the person’s name on it. He made almost $19,000 in ATM withdrawals on the account.

Where were the other board members? What were the owners thinking during the 15 years of thievery? Probably not much. The thief will obviously have to pay, likely in jail, but so will the other owners who may be unable to recover the stolen funds.

The trouble with many associations like this one, the Marquis Villas-II Condominium Association, is that there is no oversight in place. Not many people want to serve as board members because of the time commitment, and owners are sometimes just interested in common charges not increasing and enjoying their homes. While board members and owners sit complacent, without oversight, unscrupulous people insert themselves in positions of power and take advantage of their neighbors.

A tremendous red flag is the association’s bank accounts. One person should never be named on the bank accounts as a signer and certainly shouldn’t be able to withdraw from ATM’s without written authorization. Board members should have been looking at the bank statements on a monthly basis and if the association was professionally managed, the management company should have been on top of this, recommending and placing preventative measures in place. In this particular case, the accused was fraudulently creating business records, like invoices for $7,000 in light bulbs and fixtures that were never installed, or the painting, sidewalk replacement, and landscaping that never happened over the years. Annual accounting reports by an independent accountant might have shown the entries, but the accountant doesn’t typically audit those numbers. The owners, however, could have shown up at the board or at least the annual meeting and asked the right questions about the operational costs for operations that never happened.

There will be a lot of finger-pointing and lawyering in that condo association over the next year. Hopefully, there is some insurance that covers the losses, or the criminal still has some of the money that he stole for retribution, but their experience should serve as a lesson for other condo boards and owners that oversight is important in their own communities. Here is the article for more information.

Condo Claims against Sponsors – Watch the Statute of Limitation’s Clock

Condo Claims against Sponsors – Watch the Statute of Limitation’s Clock

New condominium, cooperatives and HOA’s must be mindful about time and rights against the sponsor. Statutes of limitations are the time that an association must bring a lawsuit to assert claims, before the claims become time-barred.  It is often the easiest defense for a sponsor to end a lawsuit.

The 23-23 Condominium found this out the hard way by having almost all its action against the sponsor for construction defects, dismissed on a summary judgment motion.  The Second Department explained that a “claim for damages arising from defective construction accrues on the date of completion of the work”.  If the time limit for bringing the claim has expired, then the plaintiff is out of luck. Here is the decision in that case.

Lawsuits against sponsors can be complicated if not handled properly and some of them become newsworthy which can concern some owners. On the other hand, sponsors often do not want the publicity, especially if they are continuing to develop. For example, the media picked up on the “Hyde Midtown condo association alleges construction defects galore”, reporting that “Suit targets Related Group development entity and firms that built 32-story high-rise in 2018”. That’s not a typo. The condo was constructed back in 2018. It took over 5 years for the owners to organize and sue. The suit alleges 163 construction defects including “improper installation of materials on the roof is causing water to seep down several levels” and “balcony railings for some condo units were improperly installed”. Here is an article reporting more.

With proper guidance, owners can take control of their situation against a sponsor developer and its members and investors, and make sure that they meet their contractual and other obligations. Sponsors keep control of the association boards during the early years of the development in order to keep owners disorganized without central financial resources to make sure obligations are satisfied before sponsor profits from sales are dissipated. The time to bring claims, statutes of limitations, also must be closely monitored to make sure they don’t expire. Once expired, claims can be lost forever, and the responsible parties insulated from liability. Suing is not necessary in many instances. Amicable negotiation can lead to a resolution without litigation, provided that a sponsor is being reasonable. Sometimes litigation is the only course of action to achieve the condo and its owners’ goals. For the Hyde Midtown condo association, it took over 5 years to come to that realization. Organizing early with experienced representation is the key to success.

Condo, Coop and HOA Boards in NYC can Apply to be Placed on the City’s No Short Term Renting List

Condo, Coop and HOA Boards in NYC can Apply to be Placed on the City’s No Short Term Renting List

Local Law 18, also known as the “Short-Term Rental Registration Law,” requires owners and/or renters (hosts) who want to rent out their residential units for less than 30 days to register with the New York City’s Mayor’s Office of Special Enforcement (OSE) before doing so. This law should be a game changer for condo, coop and HOA boards that have been battling with short term renters in their buildings which prohibit short term renting. The NYC law also permits certain qualified owners, including association boards, to add their building to OSE’s “prohibited building list” to prevent any short-term rental of any dwelling unit therein. Airbnb, VRBO, Booking.com and other short-term renting sites will be prohibited from authorizing bookings for unregistered short-term rentals. Short-term rentals that are properly registered, still are only allowed in Class-A multiple-dwelling buildings if the host remains in the same apartment with his or her guests, and no more than two guests are allowed at a time. The guests must also have unfettered access to all of the rooms located in that apartment.

Beginning Monday, March 6, 2023, boards can start registering their buildings for the “prohibited building list.” Building owners and boards should visit OSE’s website to access the registration or the prohibited buildings list application. OSE’s final rules (Rules), which also go into effect on March 6, 2023, provide that owners, boards, and/or managers of buildings that submit a prohibited building list application.

The application is going to require the following information:

  1. The name of a natural person making the application;
  2. A working phone number for the applicant;
  3. An email address for the applicant;
  4. The address of the building the applicant seeks to add to the list;
  5. An explanation of the relationship between the owner and the applicant;
  6. Any proof or documentation requested by the administering agency to substantiate the request where the administering agency has cause to require further verification; and
  7. The applicant must also certify that leases and other occupancy agreements for dwelling units within the building prohibit short-term rentals.


To support such application requests, we suggest boards submit their governing documents which provide that short-term rentals are prohibited in their building and if it is not clear, a board resolution providing that such short-term rentals are prohibited.

Neighbor Construction Impact can be Dangerous

Neighbor Construction Impact can be Dangerous

In representing hundreds of condos, coops and HOA’s across New York City, neighboring construction impact is a regular concern. It can range from access and protection licenses for neighbors to perform construction projects to physical, sound or nuisance impact. The scariest situations can be the physical impact and that just happened at 10th Fifth Avenue and a row house at 12th Fifth Avenue after their neighbor’s building construction at 14-16 Fifth Avenue became dangerous.

It started with falling debris and the impact then manifested itself physically. Department of Building inspectors ordered the evacuation of the residents after finding signs of movement with cracks and separation on the facade of 10th Fifth Avenue.  

If there is concern about neighboring construction’s physical impact on a building, bringing in the correct team of professionals quickly can be critical. A structural engineer can evaluate the situation visibly and perform invasive testing regarding structural stability if necessary. Having a baseline established to monitor against is very important. The neighbor should have been monitoring vibration and impact from an engineering perspective on its neighbors and there is likely liability in this situation for the damages that have incurred. Engineers often recommend vibration monitoring devices which measure vibration and can be set to issue alerts above a certain level so that the baseline that is established can be checked to see if the vibration has affected the building being monitored.

Having the right team in place to protect a building being impacted is not something that a board should wait to do. Boards should be concerned about these life, health and safety issues and have a fiduciary duty to look out for the best interest of their owners and residents. There are ways to try to get the neighbor to pay for or reimburse the building for these services but even if they aren’t willing to do so voluntarily, being proactive can avoid damage and in some instances save lives.

Here’s an article on what the DOB found at 10th Fifth Avenue.

<strong>NEW LAW REQUIRES ALL NOTARY PUBLICS TO MAINTAIN A WORK JOURNAL</strong>

NEW LAW REQUIRES ALL NOTARY PUBLICS TO MAINTAIN A WORK JOURNAL

The New York Department of State adopted NEW Regulations 182.2-182.11, which are standards relating to the performance of notarial acts. The regulations became effective as of January 25, 2023.

While the bulk of the regulations cover “electronic notarial acts,” there are provisions of the new regulations that pertain to all notaries, which everyone should be aware of.

All notaries are now required to maintain a “traditional” notary journal.

Some details:

· the journal must be maintained for at least 10 years

· it must be capable of being produced to the Secretary of State upon request

· transaction entries must be made contemporaneously with the notarial act and include the following:

1.     the date, approximate time, and type of notarial acts performed;

2.     the name and address of any individuals for whom a notarial act was performed;

3.     the number and type of notarial services provided;

4.     the type of credential used to identify the principal; and

5.     the verification procedures used for any personal appearance before the notary public.

There are other requirements that apply to all notaries but of special interest is Section 182.5 (reproduced below), which sets forth the standards of proof a notary must obtain to confirm the identity of the person appearing before the notary (assuming the person is not personally known to the notary).

Notary LawDownload
Mayor’s Office of Special Enforcement Adopts Anti-AirBnB Rules and Roadmap for Prohibited Buildings Registration

Mayor’s Office of Special Enforcement Adopts Anti-AirBnB Rules and Roadmap for Prohibited Buildings Registration

The NYC OSE has adopted final rules for Local Law 18 which coop, condo and HOA boards and their managing agents should become familiar. The rules cover the registration and requirements for short term rentals in NYC. But for coops, condo and HOAs that prohibit short term rentals, the rules provide a glimpse at the roadmap to registering their buildings with the OSE. This is a relief to boards of these associations which prohibit short term renting in their governing documents and have struggled with enforcement.

Section 21-09 of the rules covers the prohibited buildings list. The application on the OSE’s website seems to be opening for registration on March 6, 2023. The application will require the name of a natural person making the application, a phone number and email for the person, the address of the building, an explanation of the relationship between the owner and applicant and “any proof or documentation requested … to substantiate the request ….” The applicant must certify that the leases and other occupancy agreements prohibit short term rentals. The last requirement of “proof or documentation” is likely the more difficult one because we aren’t sure what the OSE will require. Associations that are professionally managed could have their managers make the application or it may be a board member doing so. The “proof or documentation” will likely be the association’s governing documents that prohibit or limit short term renting. For example, bylaws could say that rentals for less than a year are prohibited. We’ll have to see what the OSE requests and requires before adding an association building to the prohibited list.

The OSE plans to publish the list of prohibited buildings on its website and update it in real time. It is not clear if the OSE has a deal with AirBnb re making sure that it does not allow listings in buildings on the prohibited list. We’ll have to wait and see how this all pans out.

Here are the rules.

Local-Law-18-Final-RulesDownload

Condo and Coop Boards get rules from the NYC Department of Buildings on complying with Local Law 97

Condo and Coop Boards get rules from the NYC Department of Buildings on complying with Local Law 97

Under NYC Local Law 97 (Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions), most buildings larger than 25,000 square feet must meet caps on their greenhouse gas emissions beginning in 2024 or face hefty fines. By 2030 and 2050 there are increasingly tighter limits. 2024 though is right around the corner and the NYC Department of Buildings has finally issued rules on how condo and coop boards can comply with Local Law 97.

Boards and their management should familiarize themselves with the DOB’s 26 pages of rules which gives guidance on complying with this looming legal requirement. Here is the final rule the DOB released.

Final-Rule-Procedures-for-Reporting-on-and-Complying-with-Annual-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-for-Certain-BuildingsDownload
Boards have to watch their Officers – Florida Condo President arrested 3 times for hiding cameras in homes

Boards have to watch their Officers – Florida Condo President arrested 3 times for hiding cameras in homes

What a way to wake up on Christmas morning. Happy holidays to all.

Robert Orr, president of the Las Brisas Condominium Association in Florida was arrested for the third time for installing hidden surveillance cameras in owners homes. I can understand the first time, but three times. Here is the article. Mr. Orr ought to hire himself a criminal defense attorney, but the condo association should put their insurance carrier on notice in case the victims decide to point their fingers back at that board for not taking action to remove President Orr after the first, then second arrest. Three times is a charm and perhaps the owners will take action if the board isn’t willing to do so.

Condo governing documents typically include a provision indemnifying board members for acting within the scope of their authority as board members. This conduct by Orr should fall without that indemnification, but one might ask what was the rest of the board doing after it learned about the first and second arrest for invading owners’ privacy and installing surveillance cameras inside homes without authority. If an association officer is accused for bad conduct like this, boards should consider whether removing the officer from his or her position is a good idea during an official investigation and resolution of the matter. Boards can change officers simply with a board vote. Boards have a fiduciary duty to all of their owners. If an officer is accused of installing cameras inside people’s homes, removing the officer is one of the first things a board should consider. Boards typically can’t remove board members themselves and need an owners’ vote to do so depending on their bylaws. Noticing an owners meeting for the owners to make a decision on board member removal may also be a good idea. In the end, the board is above any one member and if an officer acts improperly, the board should look out for the best interest of the entire community.

Second Department says HOA Board Pet Restriction has to be a Declaration Amendment

Second Department says HOA Board Pet Restriction has to be a Declaration Amendment

The appeals court which governs over Brooklyn, Staten Island and Long Island, just issued a decision holding that the Meadowbrook Pointe Homeowners Association, Inc.’s rule that dogs greater than 25 pounds can’t be on the association premises, was unenforcible and should have been done by an amendment to the HOA’s Declaration. That would have required a vote of 66 2/3% of the owners and then a recording of the amended Declaration against each of the HOA units.

The Second Department explained that:

[T]he plaintiff demonstrated, prima facie, that the board’s adoption of the house rule was not authorized by the condominium bylaws, and thus, the adoption of that rule was not protected by the business judgment rule (see Yusin v Saddle Lakes Home Owners Assn., Inc., 73 AD3d 1168, 1171; Strathmore Ridge Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Mendicino, 63 AD3d 1038). Since neither the condominium bylaws nor the condominium declaration of covenants, restrictions, easements, charges, and liens (hereinafter the declaration) contained any restriction on the size of dogs permitted on the condominium premises, the house rule constituted an amendment of a permitted use of the plaintiff’s unit, which, pursuant to Article X of the condominium bylaws, required approval by 66 2⁄3% of the homeowners at a noticed meeting, and an amendment to the declaration (see Gabriel v Board of Mgrs. of the Gallery House Condominium, 130 AD3d 482; Board of Mgrs. of Vil. View Condominium v Forman, 78 AD3d 628, 630).

Turan v Meadowbrook Pointe Homeowners Assn., Inc., 2022 NY Slip Op 07255

It is critical for boards to have experienced counsel analyze whether a rule change is sufficient or whether an amendment to the governing documents by an owners’ vote is necessary. Read the decision here.

Turan-v-Meadowbrook-Pointe-Homeowners-Assn.-Inc.-2022-NY-Slip-Op-07255Download
Condos and Coops Banning E-Bikes

Condos and Coops Banning E-Bikes

Amending your governing documents isn’t always the easiest thing to do because it requires a vote by unit owners in condos and the proprietary lease in coops. An amendment to the governing documents is probably necessary for an e-bike ban, and can’t be handled by a board change to the condo’s rules and regulations or coop’s house rules. Opponents of the rule would argue that an e-bike ban is no different than a smoking or pet ban in a building which need to be done by governing document amendments. They would be correct that amending the governing documents makes it a certainty until the owners decide to change the governing documents again. Rule changes can be made by a board vote and thus when the board changes, the new board could easily change the rule. That’s not the case with a governing document change.

So what’s a board to do regarding an e-bike ban. If a governing document change is possible then the board could try that. If it imposes the change by a rule amendment by the board alone, it could be subject to challenge.

  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 16
  • 17

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close