• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Tax

Home Tax
New York Governor Tolls Statute of Limitations Again

New York Governor Tolls Statute of Limitations Again

New York Governor Cuomo has been issuing a lot of Executive Orders this year because of the Coronavirus Pandemic. One of the more important ones for aggrieved parties and their attorneys involves statutes of limitations.  The time that a complainant has to commence a lawsuit before it is barred is called a statute of limitations. During the Coronavirus Pandemic, states like New York have temporarily stopped (or tolled) statutes of limitations from running.  This has been done in a series of Executive Orders by the Governor.  

It has been difficult, however, to follow the Governor’s tolling of statutes of limitations in those hodge podge of Executive Orders.  There has been little news about it and only a few random articles debating if the tolls will stand up in Court.  Creative lawyers will undoubtedly try to argue that the tolls are not constitutional or otherwise legally effective, but they have been essential to lawyers and aggrieved parties.  Because courts have been closed and clients and lawyers haven’t been able to meet and confer easily, tolls to maintain the status quo were the right solution.  There will be an end to the tolls, but when that will happen is not clear.

The first Order was Executive Order 202.8 on March 20, 2020, tolling to April 19, 2020.  Thus, if there was 5 days left on a statute of limitations on March 20th, there would still be 5 days left to sue on April 19th.  The Governor clearly stated that:

In accordance with the directive of the Chief Judge of the State to limit court operations to essential matters during the pendency of the COVID-19 health crisis,  any specific time limit for the commencement, filing, or service of any legal action, notice, motion, or other process or proceeding, as prescribed by the procedural laws of the state, including but not limited to the criminal procedure law, the family court act, the civil practice law and rules, the court of claims act, the surrogate’s court procedure act, and the uniform court acts, or by any other statute, local law, ordinance, order, rule, or regulation, or part thereof, is hereby tolled from the date of this executive order until April 19, 2020

About a week and a half before the toll was to expire on April 19th, the Governor issued Executive Order 202.14 on April 7th, giving attorneys a cushion of time to react in case the toll wasn’t extended.   That time the toll was extended to 11:59 pm on April 29, 2020.  The language of the Order, however, was cryptic, and buried amongst paragraphs and paragraphs of other provisions.  Indeed, the Order read:

By virtue of Executive Orders 202.3, 202.4, 202.5, 202.6, 202.7, 202.8, 202.10, 202.11, and 202.13 which closed or otherwise restricted public or private businesses or places of public accommodation, and which required postponement or cancellation of all non-essential gatherings of individuals of any size for any reason (e.g. parties, celebrations, games, meetings or other social events), all such Executive Orders shall be continued, provided that the expiration dates of such Executive Orders shall be aligned, such that all in-person business restrictions and workplace restrictions will be effective until 11:59 p.m. on April 29, 2020, unless later extended by a future Executive Order.

As we approached April 29th, on April 16th, the Governor issued Executive Order 202.18, extending the toll again to 11:59 pm on May 15, 2020.  The trouble with this Executive Order is that the language again was buried, and the www.governor.ny.gov website, had the wrong link for 202.18 as 202.19, so you couldn’t find it (its still hasn’t been corrected).  Executive Order 202.18, provides that:

Executive Order 202.14, which extended the provisions of Executive Orders 202.3, 202.4, 202.5, 202.6, 202.7, 202.8, 202.10, 202.11, and 202.13 which each closed or otherwise restricted public or private businesses or places of public accommodation, and which required postponement or cancellation of all non-essential gatherings of individuals of any size for any reason (e.g. parties, celebrations, games, meetings or other social events), is hereby continued, provided that the expiration date of such provisions of such Executive Orders shall be aligned, such that all in-person business restrictions and workplace restrictions will be effective until 11:59 p.m. on May 15, 2020, unless later extended by a future Executive Order. All enforcement mechanisms by state or local governments shall continue to be in full force an effect until May 15, 2020 unless later extended by a future Executive Order

On May 8th, the Governor acted again on the toll, issuing Executive Order 202.29.  The new toll was to Sunday, June 7, 2020.  Again, buried in the Order, the Governor said:

I, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 29-a of Article 2-B of the Executive Law, do hereby continue the suspensions and modifications of law, and any directives, not superseded by a subsequent directive, made by Executive Order 202.15, 202.16, 202.17, 202.18, 202.19, 202.20, and 202.21, for thirty days until June 7, 2020

On Friday June 5th, decisions had to be made by attorneys for clients impacted by the toll.  No Executive Order granted another toll arrived and it was not clear whether the toll would be extended again.  The Supreme Court in New York opened for electronic filings of new lawsuits, so it was possible that the Governor was not going to extend again. However, court’s like the New York City Small Claims Court do not accept electronic filings yet, so it was not possible to file a new lawsuit there.  

On Sunday June 7, 2020, the day that the toll was set to expire under the last Executive Order 202.29 (albeit, it wasn’t clear what time on June 7th it would expire because the last Order did not specify a time), the Governor on Sunday June 7th, issued Executive Order 202.38, extending the toll to Monday July 6, 2020, providing in a cryptic way that could only be deciphered by people following the chain of Executive Orders for months:

I, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 29-a of Article 2-B of the Executive Law, do hereby continue the suspensions and modifications of law, and any directives, not superseded by a subsequent directive, made by Executive Order 202 and each successor Executive Order up to and including Executive Order 202.14, as continued as contained in Executive Order 202.27 and 202.28 until July 6, 2020.

Until all of the New York State courts allow commencement of new lawsuits, the toll has to be extended so that the status quo is maintained.  Otherwise, statutes of limitations could be missed and claims lost.  Lawyers and their clients need to be aware of this important issue and make sure they are protected.  As July 6th approaches, my hope is that tolls will no longer be necessary as we have arrived at our new normal.

IRS AUDIT NOTICE – What NOT to do!!!!

IRS AUDIT NOTICE – What NOT to do!!!!

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0ri6YkaiOg[/embedyt]
Attorney-Client Privilege is essential for Tax Audits

Attorney-Client Privilege is essential for Tax Audits

Over the last few months, the IRS and prosecutors have been ramping up efforts to go after tax violators.  In Connecticut alone, there have already been 8 arrests and criminal prosecutions, not to mention innumerable civil tax audits.  The common thread to people and businesses getting into trouble is that they did not consult an attorney as soon as they received an audit notice.  

The difference between having an attorney and not is that nearly all communications with the attorney are covered by the attorney-client privilege.  That means no-one including the IRS and prosecutors can get their hands on those communications and use them against you.

If you rely solely upon your tax preparer or new advocate with the government, none of your communications are privileged.  That means the IRS and prosecutors can ask your accountant for their emails and other documents exchanged with you.  For example, you receive an audit notice and email your tax preparer about it.  That email is discoverable.  If you emailed your attorney for legal advice on how to approach the audit and discussed your position on items being audited, that email is protected by the attorney-client privilege and not discoverable.

The best approach to an audit is a team approach where you have an attorney retained so the privilege is established and the attorney engages either your tax preparer or others as experts to help.  This approach allows for all the communications between your attorney, you and the expert accountants to remain privileged and protected from being used against you.  Tax preparer and accountants should be consulting an attorney and having their clients retain counsel at the beginning of an  audit so that the privilege is established and communications protected.  Proceeding otherwise would be negligent. 

Tax Preparer Faces 36 years in Prison for False Client Tax Returns

Tax Preparer Faces 36 years in Prison for False Client Tax Returns

Ana Nunez, of Naugatuck, also known as Ana Pagoaga has been indicted by a federal grand jury with 12 counts of filing false tax returns. Ana faces up to 36 years in jail.  It all started with an audit notice to her client.  Her communications on the audit with her client were not confidential.

Nunez owned and operated Nunez MultiServices, LLC, a tax return preparation service located in Naugatuck. From 2011 and continuing at least through 2016, Nunez falsified information on tax returns she prepared for clients and caused the returns to be filed with the IRS.

On the returns, Nunez routinely inflated income or created fictitious income; falsified expenses, including education and child care expenses, and falsified deductions, such as business mileage.  Nunez also falsely inflated information on her clients’ returns in order to increase their refunds.

Read more

Tax Crimes usually start with a Simple Audit Notice

Tax Crimes usually start with a Simple Audit Notice

On March 22nd, a landscaper from Guilford Connecticut, Louis Pocograno, pled guilty to tax evasion and will be sentenced on June 14, 2019.  What started as an audit notice from the IRS, eventually revealed that this self employed landscaper, Poco &  Son Lawn Care, LLC, failed to report income during the audit period of 2013 to 2016.  He also used a portion of the cash to pay undocumented workers he employed, and failed to collect and pay over the employment taxes for these employees.  Mr. Pocograno faces possibly five years in prison, has to pay the IRS $33,383 in past income tax, an additional $250,364.59, in employment tax , plus interest and penalties.  Read more.

Once you receive an initial audit notice from the IRS, you should immediately consult with an attorney.  Most people contact their tax preparer first, which can be a big mistake.  Your communications with your tax preparer are not confidential; meaning the IRS can ask the tax preparer to provide documentation, your emails or letters or other materials that you provided.  With an attorney, your communications are confidential and protected by the attorney-client privilege.  So, you can communicate freely with your attorney and no one including the IRS is entitled to discover those privileged communications.  This allows you to tell your story without fear of incriminating yourself.  

We represent individuals and businesses who are subject to IRS and other tax authority audit.  We can work with your tax preparer as our expert or another accountant to resolve your issue and keep you out of trouble civilly and criminally.  Our communications with the experts are confidential and protected by the attorney-work product privilege.  This could mean the difference between resolution and the place the Mr. Pocograno finds himself civilly and criminally.

 

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close