• Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment
Colbert LawColbert Law
Colbert LawColbert Law
  • Home
  • About us
  • Capabilities
    • Condo, Coop, HOA Counsel
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Employment Law
    • Tax Audits
    • Family Law
  • Insights
  • References
  • FAQ
  • Inquiry
    • Payment

Boards

Home Boards (Page 12)
Mitchell-Lama Coop Governance Requirements About to Change

Mitchell-Lama Coop Governance Requirements About to Change

Mitchell-Lama reform bill (A.7272/S.6412) has passed both the New York State Assembly and Senate and now heads to the Governor’s desk. Once signed, here are some of the changes that Mitchell-Lama Coop Boards and their managers need to know:

  • the board must hold at least six public meetings each year.
  • proxy voting is eliminated and replaced with an absentee ballot system.
  • dissolution will be a lot tougher because the threshold needed to voluntarily dissolve will be 80% of all dwelling units and back-to-back dissolution votes cannot be held, because there will be a five-year moratorium following a failed dissolution vote. 
  • Finally, any and all formal steps toward privatization can’t take place until the last of the Executive Orders related to the COVID-19 state of emergency expires or is rescinded.

Read more here.

Creative Solutions for Difficult Situations

Creative Solutions for Difficult Situations

Coop, Condo and HOA Employers can mandate Covid Vaccines in Most Cases

Coop, Condo and HOA Employers can mandate Covid Vaccines in Most Cases

Coop, condo and HOA employers can mandate that most employees be covid vaccinated according to the new pronouncement by the EEOC. However employers can’t violate provisions in the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). They should also adhere to religious exceptions, local and state law, among other considerations. Tread carefully and watch for new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines as to safety measures in the workplace.

https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws

New Coop (Definitely) and Condo (Maybe) Notice Obligation

New Coop (Definitely) and Condo (Maybe) Notice Obligation

NY State Human Rights Law Section 296 entitled “Unlawful Discriminatory Practices,” now requires housing providers to “disclose to all tenants and prospective tenants of their right to request reasonable modifications and accommodations if they have a disability. . . . ” (the “Notice”). Housing providers include those who have the “right to rent or lease” apartments. So, cooperatives have to comply and so do condo boards that own and rent units. If a coop tenant subleases or a condo tenant leases their unit, they also have to comply with the law and provide the Notice. The Notice must be delivered to all tenants and prospective tenants on or before April 2, 2021, or within 30 days of the tenancy beginning. This is going to be a headache for coop and condo boards. Stay tuned for more.

Here is a sample notice that the NYS Division of Human Rights crafted.

Condo Boards have to be Careful in Withholding the Waiver of the Right of First Refusal

Condo Boards have to be Careful in Withholding the Waiver of the Right of First Refusal

The Board of Managers of the Oceana Condominium No. Two learned recently that withholding the waiver of the right of first refusal cannot be used to block an unwanted condo sale.

In this particular condo, the President of the Board owns and lives in the unit directly below the unit being sold, and he allegedly did not want children living above him. The prospective purchaser has young children, and the President also allegedly did not want a sale for the low sales price. The contract was subject to short sale approval by the bank holding the first lien on the unit, a short sale which had been approved by the seller􏰅s bank. The purchaser claimed that the Board was troubled that it would appear in the public record and lower the value of the units in the development, so the Board interfered with her contract with the selling unit owner, so she was not able to purchase the unit. The condo board did not choose to exercise their right of first refusal, but they would not provide the document which this development ordinarily provides, stating that they were not exercising their right of first refusal. Without this document, the purchaser’s lender refused to close. The sale was lost as a result of the Board’s delay, the holder of the second lien on the unit foreclosed on the unit, preventing the purchaser from closing and the purchaser sued.

The Court threw out all of the claims against the Board and individual Board members except for a tortuous interference with contract claim against the Board. So, the litigation continues, with escalated legal fees and costs escalating because of the decision making by the Board or its President. In this particular case it appears that directors and officers insurance responded with a defense but even then the condo is responsible for paying a deductible and claims like this can impact future insurability and/or the cost of insurance. In some cases, we’ve seen individual board members ask for their own counsel because of possible conflicts of interests considering the Board President there seems to be the primary culprit.

With some good legal advice and management guidance, this situation could have been contained and avoided. For the Oceana Condominium No. Two, the saga continues.

Read the decision here.

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

New Legislation would change standard for Coop and Condo Evictions

More tenants’ rights legislation. If passed condo and coop owners would have to show “good cause” to evict.

The bills, if enacted, would change how someone owning real estate could treat an occupant of space regardless of whether the occupant had a legal right to occupy the space. These bills apply to all residential real estate except rent-stabilized and rent-controlled apartments, and owner-occupied houses with less than four units.

https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2021/A5573

Helpful Legal Tips – Opening Up Association Amenities Amidst Covid-19

Helpful Legal Tips – Opening Up Association Amenities Amidst Covid-19

Coops, condos and HOAs are itching to open up amenities that were temporarily closed because of the Covid-19 Pandemic. We are starting to be asked by boards and management for legal advice about opening up pools, gyms, public meeting rooms, roof decks, playrooms, etc. Every association is different but here are some tips that we believe will be helpful.

  1. To the extent authorized by the association’s governing documents and law, increased maintenance and cleaning expenses should be passed on to individual members using common facilities who fail to comply with applicable rules and regulations. 

Most community association boards are generally and specifically authorized by their governing documents to make and adopt rules and regulations governing the use of the common element facilities. If your association has not already done so, the board should consider passing a resolution adopting new rules or amending current rules which impose on owners increased responsibility while using the common element facilities and specifically restrict the use of common facilities by owners and residents who are sick or may have been exposed to Covid-19. Such rules could require those who use the facilities to use appropriate sanitizing and social distancing measures. In which case, the association’s rules and regulations should entitle the association to impose upon the owner the increased costs or expenses associated with the increased cleaning as a result of their behavior. Adopting a disclaimer and waiver form for use of facilities could also cover this so that additional costs to make it safe are passed along to users as opposed to all owners.

  1. Levy fines for non-compliance and earmark fines collected for COVID-19 prevention related measures.

Once the association has adopted its COVID-19 related rules and regulations, the board should be able to enforce them against violators. The board could consider earmarking non-compliance fines to help pay for the increased costs and expenses related to COVID-19 prevention. Be sure to examine your governing documents to make sure fines are within the board’s power. If not a bylaw amendment may be required.

  1. Consider including a line item in the association’s operating budget for increased COVID-19 expenses.

The goal to keep your association community safe could be expensive. Rather than trying to figure out how to pay for it later, perhaps include a new line item in the annual budget. The other benefit is that owners will see (if they read the financials) that the board is proactively acting to make the community safe by planning ahead.

  1. Consider opening only those common facilities and amenities for which the association has developed an enforceable plan of action. 

There is no one-size-fits-all COVID-19 plan, and any prevention methods and measures adopted by the board should be tailored to the specific association. There is also no requirement that the association open (or close) all common facilities and amenities at the same time. Boards could open one amenity at a time and see how it goes and then govern accordingly.

  1. Check with your insurance provider to see if there is coverage.

Before opening any amenity, boards and management should check with their insurance agents to see if their current insurance is adequate. We have learned that insurance companies are relying on exclusions in most policies regarding Covid-19 and not planning to cover certain losses. We will have to wait and see whether this turns out to be the case and whether new insurance coverage for such losses will be available at an additional cost. If there isn’t coverage for claims like people contracting Covid-19 at the pool and suing the association for not taking safety precautions, boards may decide not to open or to open only for persons who sign well crafted disclaimers and waivers. The trouble with those documents is that they may provide a defense to a claim, but the association may still have to pay to defend against it if there isn’t insurance coverage. Whether this is a risk the board wants to take will depend on the board. Boards that don’t want to take the risk themselves, could go to the owners for a vote on the matter and take the burden off of the board’s shoulders.

Covid-19 Condo, Coop, HOA Disclaimers

Covid-19 Condo, Coop, HOA Disclaimers

Covid-19 changed a lot. Condominium, cooperative HOA boards had to change as well. Protecting owners and residents in this new world presents many legal challenges and potential liabilities. Mitigating liability should be on the minds of every board and their management’s.

We haven’t seen an influx of Covid-19 liability lawsuits yet, but they will surely come in time. Insulating community associations and their boards and managers should definitely be on the agenda. Particularly because the insurance industry has indicated that COVID-19 claims will not be covered by insurance per the broad disease and health exclusions found in most policies.

So, what can be done? First, be careful and thoughtful in decision making. Make sure the board has authority to do what it is doing or not doing. This can be tricky, especially with ever changing federal, state and local laws. Before a board makes a decision that has legal implications, consult with an attorney and get sound legal advice. Boards are allowed to rely on the advice of their counsel and that will be a defense if their decision making is challenged by owners or others.

Keep a historical record of the decision making in well thought out minutes and other documentation. Sometimes lawyers will advise just to take minutes on the actual decision made by a board and not add too much detail as it is not required. The other school of thought and advice is to include details when you know the minutes are going to be used to help defend a board’s decision. This is a minefield that seasoned advice can help navigate.

Some boards are considering amending their governing documents to protect against Covid-19 liability for the association and board members individually. As with all disclaimers of liability, they are not a shield against the association being found liable for failing to take reasonable precautions to protect against foreseeable harm or injury. So, a disclaimer of liability, while helpful, is not and should not be relied on by the board to allow it to ignore open and obvious threats or dangerous conditions and take reasonable precautions to avoid them. Amending governing documents, however, is not a simple task and usually requires a meeting of owners and a vote in favor of the amendment by a super majority of owners. After passing, the amendment typically has to be recorded in the land records as well. If successful, a disclaimer of liability for COVID-19 and possible future pandemics is not such a bad idea considering that we expect insurance not to cover this liability, or become very expensive to procure such coverage. Adding a buffer in the governing documents against claims for which, as mentioned above, the association will not likely be able to insure against, should definitely be considered.

During the pandemic, some boards have adopted written waivers for owners and residents to sign before using common element. This is a policy that should be employed moving forward and will give the association and individual board members cover from liability. We’ll have to watch and see whether such waivers hold up in court after they are tested in court cases, but they certainly can’t hurt as another layer of protection. Doing them correctly so that they do not run afoul any other laws, such as discrimination laws, however, is certainly important.

Here’s a sample of an Assumption of the Risk and Waiver of Liability Relating to Coronavirus/COVID-19 form that one condo association adopted. We do not recommend the form, but wanted to give you an idea of what some association boards are adopting. If your association is interested in adopting such a waiver, it should be tailored to your association. There is not a “one size fits all” form that should be used.

The novel coronavirus, COVID-19, has been declared a worldwide pandemic by the World Health Organization. COVID-19 is extremely contagious and is believed to spread mainly from person-to-person contact. As a result, federal, state, and local governments and federal and state health agencies recommend social distancing and have, in many locations, prohibited the congregation of groups of people.

The Board of our condominium association has put in place preventative measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19; however, our condominium cannot guarantee that you or your child(ren) will not become infected with COVID-19. Further, rental of a unit and participating in common area activities could increase your risk and your child(ren)’s risk of contracting COVID-19.

By using the common area facilities in our condominium, you voluntarily assume the risk that you and your child(ren) may be exposed to or infected by COVID-19 by renting and occupying a condominium unit, and/or accessing and using the common areas and amenities including but not limited to the pool, exercise and game rooms, tennis and basketball courts, and other common areas, and that such exposure or infection may result in personal injury, illness, permanent disability, and death. You understand that the risk of becoming exposed to or infected by COVID-19 at our condominium may result from the actions, omissions, or negligence of you and others, including, but not limited to, our condominium’s employees, and other renters and their families.

You voluntarily agree to assume all of the foregoing risks and accept sole responsibility for any injury to you or your child(ren) (including, but not limited to, personal injury, disability, and death), illness, damage, loss, claim, liability, or expense, of any kind, that you or your child(ren) may experience or incur in connection with our condominium or utilization of our condominium’s amenities (“Claims”).

On your behalf, and on behalf of your children, you hereby agree to release, covenant not to sue, discharge, and hold harmless the our condominium association, its Board, employees, agents, and representatives, and our condominium’s owners of and from the Claims, including all liabilities, claims, actions, damages, costs or expenses of any kind arising out of or relating thereto. You understand and agree that this waiver and release includes any Claims based on the actions, omissions, or negligence of the our condominium and its Board, employees, agents, and representatives, and our condominium’s owners whether a COVID-19 infection occurs before, during, or after your occupancy of a unit or use of the common areas at our condominium.

Again, each association is different and requires specific legal advice in order to protect itself from liability and other exposures. Staying ahead of the curve and doing everything legally and reasonably possible to do so, is important.

Another Wrinkle in Holder of Unsold Shares’ Benefit Analysis

Another Wrinkle in Holder of Unsold Shares’ Benefit Analysis

On Thursday, January 28th, the Appeals Court in the First Department which covers Manhattan and Bronx coops issued a decision which clarifies and changed the complicated law regarding holders of unsold shares and their entitlement to special privileges.

In  Pastena v 61 W. 62 Owners Corp. (1st Dept 2019) the First Department said that “paragraph 38 of the proprietary lease, which purportedly exempts holders of unsold shares from certain expenses and fees assessed by the landlord, is void as a matter of law (see Spiegel v 1065 Park Ave. Corp., 305 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 2003])”. The Court’s pronouncement allowed coops to take a strong position that the paragraph in the proprietary lease that holders of unsold shares relied upon to say they didn’t have to pay sublet fees, was void and thus, holders of unsold shares had to pay like all other subletting shareholders. There was a lot of commentary and debate over whether the Court was correct in its statement, but that was the law in Manhattan and the Bronx.

At least until Thursday January 28, 2021, when the Court was given a softball opportunity to clear up its pronouncement. Although not argued below before the Supreme Court, on appeal, a coops counsel raised the Pastena pronouncement for the first time on appeal. The First Department disregarded the argument as not being raised before the Supreme Court below and thus not appropriate for appeal, but decided to speak on it anyway.

In Bellstell 7 Park Ave., LLC v Seven Park Ave. Corp., the First Department clarified/changed its pronouncement in Pastena, explaining now that only original purchasers from the sponsor can benefit from its prior decision voiding a paragraph from the proprietary lease as against public policy, not a subsequent holder of unsold shares.

The First Department now says that “This did not render the entirety of paragraph 38 void, however, as holders of unsold shares are routinely granted special privileges in exchange for their regulatory obligations, as they are, de facto, a different class of stock than an ordinary purchaser”.  This clouds the issue though because the question now is what are the “regulatory obligations” and did the proposed holder of unsold shares comply with the “regulatory obligations” and what if they didn’t.

Coops with these complicated questions could put the burden on the proposed holder of unsold shares who has the burden of establishing their preferential status. Instead of expensive litigation, the parties may be able to negotiate an acceptable resolution. Having experienced counsel to navigate these complex waters is critical.

Condo Board Access to Units can be Difficult

Condo Board Access to Units can be Difficult

Condo Boards sometimes have to access the inside of units. There are a variety of reasons including repairs to common elements, access to shut off valves, inspections relating to repairs in other parts of the condominium building, or a myriad of other valid, legitimate reasons. The trouble is that governing documents like the condominium’s Declaration and Bylaws may not require such access and even if it does, a unit owner may refuse to grant the access.

Condo Boards sometimes have to bring suit for Court help with access. One condo, the Carriage House Condominium, found itself is such a situation. The Board there required access to Ms. Healy’s unit in order to to make repairs to AC condensers located in her unit that service other units in the condominium.

The Supreme Court ruled that upon one day’s notice, Ms. Healy had to allow HVAC workers performing repairs or services into her unit to perform necessary HVAC maintenance and repairs, and that any such HVAC workers be accompanied by an individual associated with the managing agent for the condominium.

Healy didn’t stop there. She appealed and on appeal the First Department affirmed the Supreme Court’s decision finding no abuse of discretion.

So, the Carriage House Condominium Board had to first try to get access to make the prepare through management. After that failed, they had to retain counsel to bring the lawsuit. The Condominium incurred legal fees to bring the suit and then make the motion and then fight the appeal because the unit owner wouldn’t cooperate. That’s a lot of legal fees, cost and time.

In the end, many condominiums find themselves having to employ the same course of action to obtain access to a unit. Most condominium Declaration and Bylaws provide for reimbursement of legal fees and costs for collection of common charges and other assessments, but not for the type of legal fees incurred for accessing a unit. There may be an end around with fine imposition (assuming a Board has the power to enact and impose such fines) but the valid fines typically will not cover the legal fees and costs.

Knowing all of this, Condominium Board should consider amending their Bylaws to change the legal fee provision and allow them to recover for situations other than just collection of common charges and assessments. It is important to do this correctly and in the end, after a unit owner vote is properly secured according to the bylaws and law, the amended bylaws will have to be recorded against the unit in the public land records before the amendment will be legally effective. This is yet another expense that will likely be well worth it. While a Board is amending the Bylaws, it ought to get the most bang out of its buck by considering other amendments that can be made at the same time as the costs associated with the amendment will be similar whether it is one or a few amendments being done at the same time to the bylaws.

Read the Carriage House Condominium v. Healy, Court decision here.

  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 18
  • 19

Recent Attorney Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026
  • Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners July 2, 2026

Contact Us

Send us a note and we'll get back to you promptly.

OFFICES

  • Manhattan Office
  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Westchester Office
  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048
  • Connecticut Office
  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

Latest Publications

  • When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs July 25, 2026
  • When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers July 22, 2026
  • When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo July 21, 2026
  • Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line July 13, 2026

© 2026 Colbert Law LLC Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Highend Logo

Manhattan Office

  • 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 4032, New York, New York 10017
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Westchester Office

  • 44 South Broadway, 21st Floor, White Plains, New York 10601
  • 646.880.3000
  • 646.880.3048

Connecticut Office

  • 55 Post Road W, 2nd Floor, Westport, Connecticut 06880
  • 203.349.8100
  • 646.880.3048

OUR EXPERTISE

When Contractors Lack Licenses: Key Lessons for Condos, Co-ops, and HOAs

July 25, 2026

A recent NYC Civil Court decision (Fortes v. Decorating and...

When Bankruptcy Won’t Stop Your Foreclosure Sale: What Condo Boards and Management Need to Know About Repeat Filers

July 22, 2026

For condominium boards foreclosing on unpaid common charges,...

When Repetitive Filings Cross the Line: Lessons from Fulton v. Yameogo

July 21, 2026

Community association boards—whether governing condos,...

Condominium Boards: Why Being Aware of First Mortgage “Standing” Can Protect Your Community’s Bottom Line

July 13, 2026

When a condominium unit owner defaults on their monthly...

Winning the Common Charge Battle: How Condo Boards Prevail Against Defiant Unit Owners

July 2, 2026

Condominium boards and property managers face a unique,...

When the Neighbor Builds: What Condo and Co-Op Boards Need to Know

June 29, 2026

Construction in New York City is a fact of life, but when a...

Succession Rights in Limited-Equity Co-ops: Practical Lessons from Mutual Redevelopment Houses v. Manyevitch

June 12, 2026

Succession disputes are among the most sensitive and...

The Post-Settlement Trap: What Fiondella Teaches Co-op Boards About Stipulations and Continuing Habitability Claims

June 9, 2026

For New York cooperative boards and managing agents,...

The Derivative Action Threat: Why “Limited Common Elements” Present Litigation Risks for Condominium Boards and Managers

May 16, 2026

A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First...

Governance and Rule-Making in the Modern Condominium

April 27, 2026

Reflections on 10MSW17D LLC v. Bd. of Managers of 10...

Don’t Delay: Why Timely Enforcement of Common Charges is Critical for Condo Boards

April 15, 2026

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New York,...

RPAPL § 881 Licenses, and Why Fee Reimbursement Is a Core Deal Term

April 13, 2026

Boards and managers of condominiums, cooperatives, and...

The 432 Park Decision: A Masterclass in Risk Management for New York Condo Boards

April 2, 2026

New York condominium boards and management companies operate...

Protecting Your Building’s Integrity: Lessons from Board of Mgrs. of the 80th at Madison Condominium v. 1055 Madison Ave. Owners LLC

March 31, 2026

As a condominium board member or property manager, your...

Press Enter to search · Esc to close